Ripken was good, Not great
by John BYes, he was durable. Durability makes the compilation of good numbers look great. Gherig was durable AND great.
Q: Was he a great fielder?
A: In 21 seasons, he won 2 Gold Gloves.
Q: Was he a great base stealer?
A: In 21 seasons, he stole a total of 36 bases at a 48% success rate.
Q: Did he hit for a great average?
A: In 21 seasons, he hit .300 or better 5 times. His career average was .276.
Q: Was he a great run producer?
A: In 21 seasons, he drove in over 100 runs 4 times.
A: His career OBP was .340. He never reached .400 in any season.
A: In 21 seaons, he averaged 61 walks per year.
Q: Did he hit for power?
A: Over 21 seasons, he hit .037 home runs per at bat for a total of 431 career home runs.
Cal won the MVP in 1983 even though Jim Rice and Eddie Murray had superior numbers and Boggs batted .361.
He made it to the World Series once in 1983 and batted .167.
Cal made himself BIGGER than his team in an effort to extend his consecutive game streak. A player in the game at less than 100% isn’t helping the team. And by the numbers, less than 100% of Cal isn’t even good.
He should have relinquished the position as everyday SS much earlier, possibly allowing the Orioles to pursue other options.
Can the Orioles modern day mediocrity be related to Cal Ripken Jr.?
0 comments January 09 2007 11:35 am | John B | Discussion |