http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2007/05/17/clutch-ruling/ "This place is dead anyway." Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:18:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2007/05/17/clutch-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-1273 Mike G Thu, 17 May 2007 17:35:48 +0000 http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/?p=2757#comment-1273 Mike, I agree, but it was never spelled out in the criteria. I'm just suggesting that it be a documented way of getting a +1. Mike, I agree, but it was never spelled out in the criteria. I’m just suggesting that it be a documented way of getting a +1.

]]> http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2007/05/17/clutch-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-1272 Mike T Thu, 17 May 2007 17:26:00 +0000 http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/?p=2757#comment-1272 I had always assumed we were counting those types of hits as +1. (i.e. you couldn't get a +1 for getting a hit with a guy on 1st that didn't end up leading to an RBI, but you couldn't get a -1 in that situation either). My general understanding would be any time you drive in a run in the close game it is a +1. I had always assumed we were counting those types of hits as +1. (i.e. you couldn’t get a +1 for getting a hit with a guy on 1st that didn’t end up leading to an RBI, but you couldn’t get a -1 in that situation either). My general understanding would be any time you drive in a run in the close game it is a +1.

]]> http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2007/05/17/clutch-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-1270 Joe Thu, 17 May 2007 16:41:20 +0000 http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/?p=2757#comment-1270 Looks ok to me. Looks ok to me.

]]>