<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The firm of Giambi, Smoltz and Baldelli</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2009/01/09/the-firm-of-giambi-smoltz-and-baldelli/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2009/01/09/the-firm-of-giambi-smoltz-and-baldelli/</link>
	<description>Baseball!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2009/01/09/the-firm-of-giambi-smoltz-and-baldelli/comment-page-1/#comment-38498</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/?p=4601#comment-38498</guid>
		<description>Well...they DID get Beckett for H-Ram resulting in two championships. Not like they traded Hanley for a player past his prime. 

The counter arguments won&#039;t disappear if Smoltz receives incentives. Because that will mean that the risk paid off and he was successful. Theo will be lauded if that happens. 

I think they&#039;re down on Bucholz. Doesn&#039;t mean he won&#039;t be good, but he may not be good in the Red Sox system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;they DID get Beckett for H-Ram resulting in two championships. Not like they traded Hanley for a player past his prime. </p>
<p>The counter arguments won&#8217;t disappear if Smoltz receives incentives. Because that will mean that the risk paid off and he was successful. Theo will be lauded if that happens. </p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re down on Bucholz. Doesn&#8217;t mean he won&#8217;t be good, but he may not be good in the Red Sox system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimMc</title>
		<link>http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2009/01/09/the-firm-of-giambi-smoltz-and-baldelli/comment-page-1/#comment-38497</link>
		<dc:creator>JimMc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/?p=4601#comment-38497</guid>
		<description>Those counter arguments will disappear if (i) Smoltz receives the incentives that could send his price north of 10 mill and (ii) they trade Clay Buckwheat as anticipated.  Also, when was the last time the Yanks traded away a prospect with the tools of Hanley Ramirez?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those counter arguments will disappear if (i) Smoltz receives the incentives that could send his price north of 10 mill and (ii) they trade Clay Buckwheat as anticipated.  Also, when was the last time the Yanks traded away a prospect with the tools of Hanley Ramirez?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/2009/01/09/the-firm-of-giambi-smoltz-and-baldelli/comment-page-1/#comment-38487</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yankeeroundtable.com/?p=4601#comment-38487</guid>
		<description>Well....the counter to your point made by Red Sox people will be that the Yankees spent a lot of money or gave up prospects on the older players (Johnson, Brown, etc.). While the Red Sox have committed under $10 Million to these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;.the counter to your point made by Red Sox people will be that the Yankees spent a lot of money or gave up prospects on the older players (Johnson, Brown, etc.). While the Red Sox have committed under $10 Million to these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
